Disclaimer: This equity research report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional investment advice, financial guidance, or a recommendation to buy or sell securities.

Executive Summary

This report delivers a comprehensive fundamental analysis of PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC), systematically uncoupling the industrial software leader from algorithmic naming conflations to assess its true financial health, structural risks, and valuation multiples. Dividend Policy & Yield: PTC Inc. pays a 0.00% dividend yield, prioritizing capital retention and massive share repurchases over rigid, double-taxed cash distributions. Leverage & Maturities: The company maintains a conservative 0.31 Debt-to-Equity (D/E) ratio, carrying approximately $1 billion in core senior notes ($500 million at 3.625% maturing in 2025; $500 million at 4.000% maturing in 2028). Coverage: Interest coverage is exceptionally strong; the company generates roughly $850 million in Free Cash Flow (FCF) against roughly $38 million in fixed annual interest obligations. Valuation: Trading at a Forward P/E of ~15.35x and an EV/EBITDA of ~13.0x, PTC represents a steep discount to software sector peers and its own 5-year historical average (~45x P/E), offering an attractive P/FCF yield of roughly 17x to 18x. Risks & Execution Friction: Transitioning deeply embedded on-premise industrial software to SaaS platforms carries significant operational friction. The migration exposes PTC to competitive evaluations against rivals like Siemens NX and Dassault Systèmes CATIA. Red Flags: The company's $1.625 billion share repurchase floor is optically massive, but approximately 15% of this capital is immediately consumed by $230 million to $260 million in Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) dilution. Open Questions: Near-term market focus rests on how PTC will refinance its looming 2025 debt maturity in a higher-rate environment and whether it can maintain M&A discipline following recent asset divestitures.

Ticker Confusion Resolved: The headline regarding “recovery services for impacted importers” correlates to a private advisory firm named Peacock Tariff Consulting (PTC), which recently launched CAPE Phase 3 duty recovery programs. This report, however, focuses strictly on the publicly traded equity ticker PTC (PTC Inc.), a global leader in industrial software and digital transformation. Zero Dividend, Massive Buybacks: PTC Inc. does not pay a dividend, aggressively opting instead to return capital to shareholders through a massive $1.625 billion share repurchase program for fiscal year 2026. Balance Sheet Optimization: The company maintains a highly manageable leverage profile, underpinned by strong recurring cash flows. Investors must be wary of automated financial screeners that erroneously attribute PTC Therapeutics' (PTCT) highly leveraged convertible notes to PTC Inc.; the software giant's core debt actually consists of moderate 2025 and 2028 Senior Notes. Valuation Compression: Trading at a forward Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 15.35x, PTC Inc. represents a significant discount to its five-year historical average of ~45x, suggesting potential undervaluation in the current macroeconomic environment. Looming Execution Risks: While the transition to Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration looks promising on paper, the company faces execution risks in migrating sticky on-premise customers, alongside near-term cash flow headwinds stemming from capital gains taxes on recent divestitures.

This comprehensive equity research report deconstructs the fundamental financial architecture of PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC). The modern financial landscape is rife with algorithmic noise, often conflating disparate entities due to shared acronyms. By systematically untangling the company's true capital structure, debt maturity timeline, and valuation metrics, this analysis seeks to provide a definitive assessment of PTC Inc.'s intrinsic value. Through the lens of its recent strategic divestitures and aggressive capital return programs, we evaluate whether the software provider's current market pricing accurately reflects its highly durable, recurring revenue model.

Navigating Algorithmic Noise: Tariffs, Therapeutics, and Technology

Before conducting a deep fundamental dive into PTC Inc., it is imperative to address a significant hazard in modern, automated equity research: ticker and acronym conflation. The title of this report reflects a recent press release regarding “CAPE Phase 3 Recovery Services for Importers Impacted by IEEPA Duties,” which was announced by a private Canadian trade advisory firm named Peacock Tariff Consulting (PTC) (prnewswire.com) [cite: 1, 2].

To clarify this jargon for the financial reader: CAPE Phase 3 refers to the “Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries,” a specialized refund process launched by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in October 2026 for eligible importers [cite: 1]. IEEPA Duties stem from the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 federal law authorizing the U.S. President to unilaterally impose emergency import tariffs based on national security threats, a mechanism utilized broadly since 2025 against imports from countries linked to fentanyl trafficking and migration crises (gofreight.com) [cite: 3, 4]. While Peacock Tariff Consulting provides valuable services for businesses navigating these complex global supply chain tariffs and seeking IEEPA duty refunds via ACE entry summaries, the advisory firm has absolutely no relation to the publicly traded equity ticker evaluated here [cite: 5].

Furthermore, automated financial data aggregators frequently misattribute the debt profiles of other similarly named equities. For instance, recent financial news regarding a $500 million issuance of 0% Convertible Senior Notes due 2031 used to retire 1.5% notes due 2026 actually belongs to PTC Therapeutics (NASDAQ: PTCT), a mid-cap biopharma company—not the industrial software company PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC) (dealroom.co).

Having cleared this algorithmic noise, the remainder of this report focuses exclusively on PTC Inc. (NASDAQ: PTC), a Boston-based global software company that enables industrial manufacturers to digitally transform product design, manufacturing, and lifecycle management.

Corporate Overview and Strategic Realignment

To understand PTC Inc.'s financial metrics, one must first understand its evolving business model. The company's core software portfolio serves as the foundational architecture for physical research and development (R&D) workflows across the manufacturing sector. Its flagship products include Creo for Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Windchill for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), supplemented by Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Service Lifecycle Management (SLM) tools (investor.ptc.com).

Historically, PTC sold these tools through perpetual, on-premise licenses. Today, the company has successfully transitioned to a highly durable subscription model, with 95% of its total revenue now recurring in nature (sec.gov).

Core Product Architecture and Economics

To effectively model PTC's recurring revenue stream, it is critical to break down the functional scope, pricing power, and real-world utility of its four main product pillars:

Creo (Computer-Aided Design): Functional Scope: Creo is a comprehensive 3D modeling suite supporting both parametric and direct modeling, widely utilized for generative design and additive manufacturing (firstmold.com) [cite: 6]. Current Price/Cost: Pricing is strictly tiered and scalable. Subscriptions start at $3,040 annually for the basic “Creo Design Essentials” locked license, scaling through Advanced tiers up to $21,300 for the floating “Creo Design Premium” package, and peaking at roughly $29,400+ for the “Design Premium Plus/Professional” tier containing all advanced simulation extensions (nxrev.com) [cite: 7, 8]. Availability: Available via subscription with a 30-day free trial for prospective clients (scan2cad.com) [cite: 7, 9]. Real-World Context: Ideal users are startups and SMEs within discrete manufacturing who value a user-friendly interface and robust 3D CAD/PLM integration. Anti-use case: Companies strictly requiring 2D architectural drafting or casual designers who cannot justify the $3,000+ baseline cost [cite: 10, 11]. User feedback praises its UI, Map Keys, and Part Family creation, but notes a steep learning curve for extreme complexities compared to simpler entry-level tools [cite: 12, 13]. Windchill (Product Lifecycle Management): Functional Scope: Windchill serves as the central data repository managing the entire lifecycle of a product (Bill of Materials, engineering changes, compliance) [cite: 14]. Current Price/Cost: PTC does not publish standard retail pricing, opting for custom enterprise quoting based on named vs. concurrent seats and processing demands. However, industry benchmarks indicate basic user access starts around $35 per month (or ~$263/year for base licenses). Scaling up, specialized distributed processing or collaboration servers can reach $75,000, ensuring massive revenue capture from large deployments (nxrev.com) [cite: 14, 15]. Availability: Enterprise SaaS or on-premise; no free tier or free trial is provided [cite: 15, 16]. Real-World Context: Ideal for heavy discrete manufacturers, aerospace, and medical device companies averaging $25M-$500M in revenue needing rigorous audit trails [cite: 17]. Anti-use case: Process manufacturers (e.g., chemicals, food) are widely advised against adopting Windchill due to its discrete-part orientation [cite: 17]. Codebeamer (Application Lifecycle Management): Functional Scope: Acquired to bolster ALM capabilities, Codebeamer manages the software development lifecycle, risk management, and testing specifically for physical products embedded with software [cite: 18]. Current Price/Cost: Billed annually, costs start at $1,500 to $1,670 per user/year for basic Registered Licenses, scaling up to roughly $9,620 for top-tier Premium Concurrent licenses (capterra.com) [cite: 19, 20, 21]. Availability: Offers a 30-day free trial for enterprise exploration [cite: 21, 22]. Real-World Context: Ideal for automotive and medical device engineers needing strict software traceability and regulatory safety compliance within a hardware product [cite: 18]. ServiceMax (Service Lifecycle Management): Functional Scope: Built on the Salesforce platform, ServiceMax tracks physical assets in the field, managing technician dispatch, maintenance schedules, and warranty claims [cite: 23]. Current Price/Cost: Base user licenses range from $59 to $125+ per month. Because it requires a Salesforce license to function, total cost of ownership is high; a standard 10-technician implementation costs between $15,000 and $25,000 annually, with initial setup fees ranging from $10,000 up to $200,000 for complex enterprise rollouts (fieldcamp.ai) [cite: 23, 24]. Availability: Custom enterprise quotes only; no free tier or free trial is provided [cite: 25]. Real-World Context: Ideal for massive enterprises (50+ technicians) in complex manufacturing and utilities already utilizing Salesforce [cite: 23, 24]. Anti-use case: Small home-service businesses (under 20 technicians) or teams unwilling to lock into the Salesforce software ecosystem [cite: 23, 24].

The Divestiture of Kepware and ThingWorx

A critical component of PTC's recent financial narrative is its aggressive portfolio pruning. In March 2026, PTC closed the sale of its Kepware (industrial connectivity) and ThingWorx (Internet of Things) businesses to the alternative asset management firm TPG (investor.ptc.com).

The transaction generated $523 million in cash proceeds upon closing. After accounting for roughly $40 million in divestiture-related costs and approximately $110 million in capital gains taxes, PTC netted roughly $375 million in after-tax proceeds (stblaw.com).

This divestiture carries significant implications for the company's valuation and growth trajectory: 1. Strategic Focus: By offloading its IoT and connectivity arms, management is concentrating capital and engineering resources on its high-margin core: CAD, PLM, and the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) across these platforms. 2. Short-Term Cash Flow Headwinds: While strategically sound, the divestiture creates a localized drag on Free Cash Flow (FCF). The company guided for a $70 million net FCF headwind in 2027 due to the loss of IoT operating cash generation, alongside the aforementioned $150 million in one-time transaction and tax costs hitting the 2026 books (fool.com).

Despite these near-term cash frictions, the divestiture ultimately leaves PTC a leaner, more focused entity capable of executing its aggressive capital return initiatives.

Dividend Policy, History, and Yield

A comprehensive analysis of an equity's capital allocation strategy must evaluate how the company returns excess cash to its shareholders. For PTC Inc., the strategy is clear, singular, and highly aggressive.

Zero Dividend Yield

PTC Inc. currently pays a 0.00% dividend yield and has no history of issuing regular quarterly cash dividends (dividend.com). In the technology and software sector, a zero-dividend policy is standard for companies in aggressive growth or transitional phases.

From a corporate finance perspective, dividends represent a rigid, permanent commitment of capital that is subject to double taxation (once at the corporate level, and again at the shareholder level). By eschewing a dividend, PTC retains maximum flexibility to deploy its robust operating cash flow toward strategic tuck-in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) or share repurchases.

Capital Allocation: The Share Repurchase Engine

Instead of issuing taxable dividends, PTC has designated share repurchases as its primary vehicle for shareholder return. Following the influx of cash from the Kepware and ThingWorx divestiture, management dramatically accelerated its buyback program.

During the third fiscal quarter of 2026 alone, PTC repurchased approximately $525 million in common stock. This aggressive action brought the company's total expected fiscal 2026 share repurchases to a staggering target of $1.625 billion (tipranks.com).

Implications of the Buyback Strategy: EPS Accretion: By executing these buybacks, PTC anticipates reducing its fully diluted share count from 121 million shares in fiscal 2025 to approximately 116 million by the end of fiscal 2026 (fool.com). A shrinking denominator artificially, yet effectively, inflates Earnings Per Share (EPS), masking softer revenue periods. Management Conviction: Allocating $1.625 billion to open-market repurchases and Accelerated Share Repurchase (ASR) agreements indicates that the C-suite and the board of directors view the stock as fundamentally undervalued. Offsetting Dilution: As explored later in this report, PTC relies heavily on Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) to retain engineering talent. A massive share repurchase program is an absolute necessity to prevent SBC-induced dilution from destroying shareholder value.

Leverage, Debt Maturities, and Coverage

A critical pillar of equity analysis involves stress-testing the balance sheet. In an era of elevated interest rates, heavily indebted software companies can quickly find their operating cash flows consumed by debt servicing. PTC Inc., however, maintains a conservative and highly manageable leverage profile.

The Debt Profile

As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2026, PTC carried roughly $1.4 billion in total long-term debt against $351.5 million in cash and cash equivalents (stocktitan.net).

The company's core fixed-income obligations stem from a dual-tranche Senior Note issuance executed in February 2020. This debt structure is straightforward and avoids the toxic, equity-linked dilution risks associated with convertible notes (which, as noted in the introduction, mistakenly populate in some financial data feeds due to the PTC Therapeutics naming overlap).

The true PTC Inc. debt tranches are as follows: $500 Million 3.625% Senior Notes: Issued in February 2020, maturing on February 15, 2025. $500 Million 4.000% Senior Notes: Issued in February 2020, maturing on February 15, 2028 (sec.gov).

Beyond these senior notes, the company utilizes a revolving credit line (historically drawn around $200 million to $300 million depending on the quarter) and a term loan that began amortizing in March 2024 (sec.gov).

Coverage and Leverage Ratios

PTC's leverage is fundamentally sound when viewed through the lens of its cash generation capabilities. Debt-to-Equity (D/E): The company boasts a moderate D/E ratio of approximately 0.31, indicating that it does not rely excessively on debt financing to fund its operations (stocktitan.net). Free Cash Flow Coverage: The ultimate test of leverage is the ability to service it. PTC generated $857 million in free cash flow in fiscal 2025 and, despite the loss of IoT cash flows, continues to guide for roughly $850 million in FCF for fiscal 2026 (fool.com). With annual interest payments on its $1 billion in senior notes totaling roughly $38 million, the company's interest coverage ratio is exceptionally robust.

The primary debt-related event on the horizon is the looming maturity of the $500 million 3.625% notes in early 2025. Given the company's robust free cash flow and nearly $1 billion in available revolving credit capacity, PTC faces virtually no liquidity crisis in retiring or refinancing this tranche. However, investors should monitor the refinancing rate, as new debt issued in the current macroeconomic climate will undoubtedly carry a higher coupon than the 3.625% secured in 2020.

Valuation Analysis: Multiples and Comparables

Valuing a transitioning software company requires looking beyond traditional GAAP metrics, as non-cash amortization from past acquisitions and heavy stock-based compensation can obscure underlying cash generation.

Price-to-Earnings (P/E) Compression

Historically, PTC traded at a premium valuation typical of high-growth SaaS entities. Over the past five years, the stock's P/E ratio averaged roughly 45.9x (public.com). However, recent market dynamics and a strategic shift in growth expectations have severely compressed this multiple.

As of late 2026, PTC's trailing twelve-month (TTM) P/E ratio sat between 13.0x and 13.5x, while its Forward P/E ratio hovered around 15.35x (gurufocus.com).

This massive contraction from historical averages suggests one of two scenarios: 1. Value Trap: The market fundamentally doubts the company's ability to maintain double-digit Annual Run Rate (ARR) growth following the divestiture of its IoT assets. 2. Undervaluation: The market is improperly penalizing the stock for temporary, divestiture-related revenue dips, creating a wide margin of safety for long-term investors.

EV/EBITDA and Cash Flow Yield

Because PTC carries a moderate debt load and holds varying cash balances, Enterprise Value (EV) metrics offer a cleaner picture of its valuation than equity-only P/E ratios. EV/Revenue: The company trades at roughly 6.4x EV/Revenue. EV/EBITDA: The company trades at an EV/EBITDA multiple of approximately 13.0x (multiples.vc).

When analyzing Free Cash Flow, PTC converts roughly 31.3% of its revenue directly into FCF, a testament to its highly efficient, software-based operating model (stocktitan.net). With a market capitalization of roughly $14.7 billion to $16 billion and guided FCF of $850 million, the stock yields a highly attractive Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow (P/FCF) ratio of roughly 17x to 18x. For an industrial software company with a 95% recurring revenue base, an 18x FCF multiple is highly compelling.

Industry Comparables

When benchmarked against its peers in the application software and CAD/PLM sectors, PTC appears relatively cheap, standing out as a rare “value” play within the technology sector heavily supported by its aggressive share repurchase floor. Valuation metrics as of Q3/Q4 2026 demonstrate that PTC trades at a deep discount to core software peers, maintaining the lowest multiples across all key value indicators despite its 95% recurring revenue base.

| Ticker / Company | Market Cap (Approx. 2026) | Forward P/E | EV/EBITDA | Price-to-FCF (P/FCF) | Key Sector Focus | | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | :— | | PTC (PTC Inc.) | ~$15.0 Billion | ~15.35x | ~13.0x | ~17.5x | Industrial CAD, PLM, ALM | | ADSK (Autodesk) | ~$51.0 Billion | 17.06x – 22.52x | ~36.0x | ~30.0x | Architectural CAD, Media | | ANSS (Ansys) | ~$32.9 Billion | 29.24x – 31.49x | ~36.38x | ~37.96x | Engineering Simulation | | ADBE (Adobe) | ~$134.0 Billion | 8.50x – 13.31x | ~17.2x | 9.0x – 13.6x | Creative Software, SaaS |

(Data derived from 2026 financial consensus models [cite: 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].)*

Competitors like Autodesk (ADSK) and Ansys (ANSS) routinely command multiples well above 30x on EV/EBITDA and P/FCF, whereas PTC's sub-16x Forward P/E ratio positions it securely at the value end of the spectrum (companiesmarketcap.com).

Risks, Red Flags, and Open Questions

While the valuation multiples and cash flow generation present a bullish thesis, rigorous equity analysis demands a thorough autopsy of the bearish counter-narrative. PTC Inc. faces several structural and macroeconomic risks that could derail its growth trajectory.

Risk 1: Execution Friction in Cloud Migration

The core of PTC's future growth relies on migrating a massive, legacy on-premise customer base to its cloud-native SaaS platforms. Unlike migrating a general-purpose CRM, transitioning industrial CAD and PLM software is fraught with complexity. These systems are deeply embedded into the physical manufacturing workflows, supply chains, and regulatory compliance protocols of clients like Caterpillar and Thermo Fisher.

The risk here is twofold. First, the sheer cost and operational downtime required for migration may cause customers to delay their transitions indefinitely, stalling PTC's SaaS ARR growth. Consider the real-world operational friction observed when Vitesco Technologies (a spin-off from Continental AG) migrated its Windchill PLM system to the AWS cloud: the project required migrating 70 TB of file system data alongside 5 TB of core database data, mandating a complete conversion from SQL Server to Oracle, all while coordinating with external IT managers like T-Systems and HCLTech to ensure zero operational downtime for its 3,700 global engineers (t-systems.com) [cite: 34, 35, 36]. The gravity of migrating such massive architectural loads cannot be understated.

Second, a forced migration creates a natural inflection point where a customer will inevitably evaluate competing platforms. When forced to undergo the pain of a system overhaul, a legacy PTC client might take the opportunity to test rival offerings (seekingalpha.com). Specifically, PTC Creo (which holds a 14.9% to 15.1% mindshare in the CAD category) routinely battles for enterprise contracts against Dassault Systèmes' CATIA (a Class-A surfacing juggernaut commanding 14.4% to 15.2% mindshare and costing $15,000 to $50,000+ per year) and Siemens NX (which holds a 15.3% mindshare and excels in unified CAD/CAM/CAE integration) (peerspot.com) [cite: 12, 13, 37, 38, 39].

Risk 2: The Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) “Red Flag”

A critical red flag for any technology equity is the gap between reported non-GAAP metrics and actual GAAP profitability. PTC leans heavily on Stock-Based Compensation (SBC) to incentivize and retain top-tier engineering talent.

Management's fiscal 2026 guidance includes an assumption of approximately $230 million to $260 million in stock-based compensation expenses (investor.ptc.com). While SBC preserves cash flow in the immediate term, it represents a real economic cost to shareholders via relentless equity dilution.

This dynamic recontextualizes the company's vaunted $1.625 billion share repurchase program. Evaluating the exact mathematical breakdown reveals the “SBC treadmill” effect: At the midpoint of $245 million in SBC, roughly 15.1% of the entire $1.625 billion buyback capital is instantly vaporized just to neutralize the new shares handed to executives and engineers. While the remaining ~$1.38 billion is what successfully drives the actual reduction of the public float from 121 million down to 116 million shares, investors must deduct SBC from standard Free Cash Flow figures to arrive at a true, unencumbered owner's earnings metric.

Risk 3: AI Monetization and Expectation Risk

PTC has heavily marketed the integration of Artificial Intelligence into its software stack, announcing near-seven-figure AI deals utilizing “ServiceMax AI” and pushing AI capabilities across its Windchill and Creo suites (fool.com). Management posits that embedded AI will accelerate customer urgency to modernize their product-data foundations, moving them to PTC's systems of record (finance.biggo.com).

The open question is whether AI will actually serve as a standalone monetization driver or merely act as table stakes. In the hyper-competitive software sector, AI features often become quickly commoditized. If customers expect AI-driven generative design and predictive maintenance to be included in standard subscription tiers at no extra cost, PTC may find itself incurring massive R&D and compute costs without a proportional increase in pricing power.

Open Questions for Future Quarters

As analysts look ahead to the remainder of the fiscal year and the subsequent debt maturity cycle in 2025, several key questions remain unanswered: 1. Refinancing Strategy: How will the company handle the maturity of its $500 million 3.625% notes in February 2025? Will they utilize their massive cash flow to retire the debt entirely, or refinance it into a higher-interest facility, thereby slightly denting future FCF? 2. M&A Appetite: Following the Kepware and ThingWorx divestitures, management noted that capital allocation would favor tuck-in M&A alongside share buybacks (stockanalysis.com). Will the company maintain acquisition discipline, or risk overpaying for a buzzy AI startup to bolster its SaaS narrative? 3. Macro-Industrial Sensitivity: With PTC's fortunes directly tied to global manufacturing and R&D capital expenditures, how will the company's ARR hold up if a macroeconomic slowdown severely contracts industrial budgets?

Synthesis

PTC Inc. presents a fascinating study in corporate transition. By offloading its peripheral IoT assets, the company has consolidated its focus around a highly defensive, deeply embedded moat in CAD and PLM software. While near-term cash flow is suppressed by the tax consequences of these divestitures, the underlying business is throwing off immense amounts of cash.

For the astute investor willing to look past the algorithmic confusion regarding its ticker symbol, PTC offers a rare combination in modern technology equities: a deeply discounted P/E multiple, a disciplined and deleveraged balance sheet, and a management team utilizing billions in cash flow to actively shrink the share base. If the company can successfully navigate the extreme data friction of its SaaS cloud migration and effectively monetize its AI investments, the current valuation compression may ultimately represent a transient mispricing.

Sources: 1. prnewswire.com 2. prnewswire.com 3. gofreight.com 4. ayarlaw.com 5. peacocktariffconsulting.com 6. firstmold.com 7. eacpds.com 8. nxrev.com 9. scan2cad.com 10. tristar.com 11. pshdesign.com 12. peerspot.com 13. peerspot.com 14. nxrev.com 15. saasworthy.com 16. trustradius.com 17. softwareconnect.com 18. 3hti.com 19. 3hti.com 20. capterra.com 21. capterra.com 22. ptc.com 23. fieldcamp.ai 24. itqlick.com 25. g2.com 26. gurufocus.com 27. valueinvesting.io 28. companiesmarketcap.com 29. gurufocus.com 30. marketscreener.com 31. stockanalysis.com 32. financecharts.com 33. stockanalysis.com 34. hcltech.com 35. itcinfotech.com 36. t-systems.com 37. getleo.ai 38. 6sense.com 39. tristar.com

For informational purposes only; not investment advice.